28 KIPP v. HANNA.

afterwards met with considerable losses at sea, and otherwise, by
reason whereof he was compelled to take the benefit of the insol-
vent laws, as stated; and he denied all fraud, &c. To this answer
the plaintiffs filed exceptions on the 15th of December, 1820.

'{he defendant Warner, by his answer, admitted, that the con-
veyance was made to him, as set forth in the bill, and said, that
afterwards the defendant Sarah, the wife of Alexander, furnished
him with $1698 42, with which he had satisfied the claims upon
the property held by the defendants Jacquin and Burhing; that,
ever since the execution of the deed to him by the defendant Alex-
ander, the property had been held and enjoyed by his wife and
children; and this defendant denied all fraud, &c.

After the subpoena against Jacquin had been returned summoned,
and, before he had answered, his death was suggested; and the
case thus abated as to him.

The defendant Tyson, by his answer, admitted, that he had been
appointed one of the trustees of the defendant Jacquin; but
averred, that he had no knowledge of any other matter set forth in
the bill.

The defendant Hall, by his answer, admitted, that he had been
appointed one of the trustees of the defendant Jacquin, as stated ;
but averred, that he had never accepted the trust; and disclaimed
all interest in this suit.

15th December, 1820.—KILTY, Chancellor.—On motion it is
Ordered, that the bill be dismissed as against the defendant
Andrew Hall, with costs.

The defendant Sarah, wife of the defendant Alexander, having
failed to answer, and having been attached, for not answering; the
plaintiffs, by their petition, prayed, that she might be brought before
the court, £c.

13th July, 1821.—KILTY, Chancellor.—Ordered, that the sheriff
of Baltimore county, bring into court the defendant Sarah Hanna,
on the 21st day of the present month, the said Sarah Hanna,
being returned by him attached for not answering the bill in this
suit, (a)

Soon after the passing of this order, the defendant Sarah, the
wife of Alexander, put in her separate answer, in which she ad-

(o) Milf. Plea. 105. Le Texier v. The Margravine of Anspach, 15 Ves. 164.