clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 702   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INDEX. 7^3

If any of the essential component facts
of the case be not proved, or be dis-
proved, the bill must be dismissed, 255.
If the cause of suit as stated did not exist
when the bill was filed, or has been ex-
tinguished or barred, the bill must be
dismissed, 255.
Where there are a plurality of defendants,
and the subject in controversy is di-
visible, there may be a decree against
all for a part, or if they are disjunc-
tively or separately liable there may be
a decree against each, 256.
If the defence of any one defendant goes
to the whole of one and the same cause
of suit, the bill must be dismissed, al-
though as against some others it might
have been taken pro confesso, 255, 266.
A defendant who can be in no way held
liable cannot be allowed to put in a de-
fence against the whole or any part of
the case, 276.

PRACTICE.

A party may by petition object to the
sufficiency of an appeal bond, and be
allowed to take testimony and have the
obligors called on to shew cause. — Ring-
gold's case, 5.
The principles and practice of this court
derived from that of England, 18.
Upon a defendant's being returned sum-
moned he may appear and demur, plead
or answer. — Cowell v. Sebrey, 18.
A defendant failing to appear, demur,
plead, or answer, after having been
summoned, may be attached, 18.
All sheriffs to attend and make return of
process, 18.
Where process is prayed against several
defendants they must all answer or the
case be in a situation to have the bill
taken pro confesso, before there can be
any decree. — Hoye v. Penn, 33, 34.
Where two or more sue as joint creditors,
the proportion due to each may be ad-
justed after the sale has been made and
the proceeds brought in, 37.
The surplus of the proceeds of sale may
be awarded to the representatives of the
debtor in proportion to their respective
interests, 39.
Money ordered to be paid to the attorney
in fact or solicitor of the party, 40.
The trustee under the decree has the con-
trol of the suit on the bond against the
purchaser, 41.
If a purchaser has no design to baffle the
court and is unable to comply, he may
be discharged on payment of costs. —
Deaver v. Reynolds, 50.
A trustee under a decree may be ordered
to invest money, and on failing to do so
or to bring it into court, may be charged
with compound interest. — Latimer v.
Hanson, 53.
Cases brought here from a county court
must be followed out as if they bad

originated here without revising or re-
versing any previous order or decree. —
Strike's case, 67.
Further directions are those orders given
for the purpose of following out the
equity established in substance by the
decree, 69.
In a creditors suit if a claim be strongly
litigated and of difficult investigation,
an issue may be sent out to be tried by
a jury. — Ringgold v. Jones, 89.
An order to produce books, &c. can only
be obtained by a party interested in
such as he particularly specifies, against
a party to the suit, 90.
A plaintiff cannot be allowed to split up
his claim and bring a separate suit on
each part, or to introduce any addition
to it after a decree for a sale. — Strike's
case, 95.
There is no publication of depositions —
all objections to them are open, and
may be taken at the hearing, 96.
Where it is desired, that the auditor should
state an account from the proofs some
of which are objected to, such objec-
tion must be first disposed of, 96.
Contracts between a solicitor and suitor
for professional services cannot be in-
troduced into or blended with the cause
of suit, 98.
A form of an order nisi to have the bill
taken pro confesso. — Burch v. Scott, 114.
Orders and decrees may be altered or re-
scinded during the term; after that only
by original bill or bill of review, 120.
The filing of a bill of review or an origi-
nal bill to set aside a decree does not of
itself suspend its execution, 125.
A bill of review for newly discovered mat-
ter filed without leave may be dismissed
on motion. — Carroll v. Parran, 125.
A defendant may, on motion, obtain further
time to answer, 125.
After the lapse of the time allowed by an
order of publication against an absent
defendant, he must appear and also an-
swer, or the bill may be taken pro con-
fesso. — Clapham v. Clapham, 126.
During the term an interlocutory decree
may be set aside on appearance with-
out answer under the general powers of
the court. — Hepburn v. Mollison, 127.
A decree by default for more than is due
may after the term, if the plaintiff has
lost no testimony, be set aside to let in
a defence upon the merits. — Burch v.
Scott, 129.
Where a suit has abated by death, to be so
entered, and not brought forward on the
docket—Hall v. Hall, 132,
A female defendant having married, her
husband may be made a party, and an
attachment issued against both to en-
force an answer. — Taylor v. Gordon, 132.
A subpoena ad respondendum may be serv-
ed by the sheriff or by any person;
but it by any but a legal officer the ser-



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 702   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives