clear space clear space clear space white space
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 689   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
clear space clear space clear space white space

690 INDEX.

The assignee of a bond takes it subject to
all equity with or without notice. —
Estep v. Watkins, 490.
An assignment of a bond, given to secure
the payment of the purchase money,
does not carry with it the vendor's equi-
table lien. — Iglehart v. Armiger, 523.

The mode of proceeding by caveat to pre-
vent the emanation of a patent for land
in Maryland similar to that of Eng-
land. — Cunningham v. Browning, 301,
On hearing a caveat the chancellor sits as
a court of common law, 304.
A caveat is a petition or suggestion that
the great seal should not be put to a
patent grant as prayed, 304.
Proceedings in the land office other than
those under a caveat, 314.
The form and course of proceeding on a
caveat before the chancellor of Mary-
land, 315, 319, 320.
The grounds upon which a caveat may be
entered, 316; Ridgely v. Johnson, 316;
Aisquith v. Godman, 317; Hammond v.
Godman, 318.
Instances of caveat other than that to pre-
vent the emanation of a patent for land.
— Cunningham v. Browning, 324.
If the cause of caveat be doubtful it is the
regular course to overrule it, and let a
patent issue so as to give the parties an
opportunity of having the matter de-
termined by a formal proceeding at law
or in equity. — Ridgely v. Johnson, 816.


An affidavit made in another State to an
answer to a bill in this court is not a
judicial proceeding of another State
within the meaning of the constitution
of the United States. — Gibson v. Til-
ton, 352.
The facility with which the constitution
may be amended gives to the General
Assembly an almost unlimited power. —
Chancellor's case, 605.
Under the colonial constitution the judi-
cial department badly organized, 607.
The history of judicial independency in
England and in this country, 607, 615.
A consideration of the article of the De-
claration of Rights relative to judicial
independency, 618.
The mode of appointing and constituting
a chancellor, 623.
The organization of the judicial depart-
ment alter the formation of the consti-
tution, 628.
The causes which prevented the legisla-
ture from securing to the chancellor
and judges their salaries immediately
after the constitution went into opera-
tion, 645,

It is in the power of the House of Dele-
gates alone to prevent the payment of
any debt due from the State, 667.

Real or personal property taken and sold
under a fieri facias is thereby con-
verted into money; and the realty is
thus converted into personalty. — Jones
v. Jones, 450.
Real estate may be converted into per-
sonalty at law by a sale under the act
to direct descents, 453, 460.
In equity the mode in which the judicial
proceeding effects the conversion is dif-
ferent, 454.
Although the sale of a real estate to effect
a division converts it into personalty,
yet that should not prejudice the rights
of any one, much less those of a feme
covert, 455; Wells v. Roloson, 456.
Can real estate be constitutionally con-
verted into personalty to the prejudice
of any one without Ms consent ? 457.


Postage, notarial seals, &c. cannot be tax-
ed as costs. — McMechen v. Story, 186.
On the bill's being dismissed by the plain-
tiff, the costs on being taxed by the
register may be ordered to be paid, or
cause shewn. — Diffenderffer v. Hillen,
On a bill for dower, if the heir throws no
difficulty in the way, the widow has no
costs. -— H. K. Chase's case, 231.
There may be a revivor of a decree for
costs. — C. D. Owings' case, 409.
In partition the costs are borne equally or
in proportion to the shares of each. —
Hughes' case, 50; Corse v. Polk, 234.
The auditor's fees are a part of the costs,
and may be recovered as such. — Dorsey
v. Hammond, 467.
The origin, nature, and extent of the rule
which may be laid on a plaintiff to give
security for costs. — Mayer v. Tyson,

This court is in its institution and forms
of procedure absolutely civil; yet if re-
lief be asked on the ground of fraud
against an instrument, it may be shown
to be a forgery. — Fornshill v. Murray,
The court of chancery of Maryland de-
rived from and similar to that of Eng-
land. — Cunningham v. Browning, 301;
Chancellor's case, 648.
This is not a term court in the sense of
the common law, although it has its
regular terms and sittings. — Burch v.
Scott, 126; Chancellor's case, 678.
The difference between the duties of
courts of common law and courts of
equity. — Chancellor's case, ib.


clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 689   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  

This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact

©Copyright  August 02, 2018
Maryland State Archives