clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 680   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

THE CHANCELLOR'S CASE. 681

the chancellor deems it wholly unnecessary to say one word respecting
himself. When he accepted the office of chancellor of Maryland, he

now under consideration. The New York court of last resort is composed of the Senate
aided by and together with the chancellor or the judges. The senators are compen-
sated for their attendance by an allowance of so much for each day's attendance; and
the chancellor and judges are paid as judges of the courts of original jurisdiction; but
receive nothing in addition for the discharge of their duties in this appellate court.

This ultimate tribunal of New York, if not the very best, is admitted on all hands
to be fully equal to any court of last resort in the Union. Its business has never
been suffered to accumulate or fall unreasonably behind hand; and the reports of its
decisions are received every where as illustrations and guides of the highest respec-
tability. It was organized in 1776; and, on being reviewed, by the convention,
called together in 1821, for revising the constitution, it was continued and reestab-
lished without a dissenting voice. (Debates New York Convention, 1821. ) The
senators bring into it a mass of sound common sense by which cases are met upon
their merits; the propensity to overmuch technicality is checked; and there is
besides, found among the senators a degree of legal science often superior to that of
the bench, and always sufficient to keep down the mere esprit du corps of the regular
judges. The senators come from, and at short intervals return to the people; and
hence it has been truly and emphatically called " the court of the people; " and as
such its proceedings attract much and general attention; and have necessarily a
widely extended publicity which does not always follow, and can rarely be given to
the proceedings of a court attended by none but lawyers, and whose decisions are
selected and reported for their use only. —(Debates N. York Conv. 517, 609, 611. )

Although in cases of family disputes in chancery, to save the feelings of the par-
ties and with their express consent, the matter may be privately heard; (In the mat"
ter of Lord Portsmouth, Coop. Rep. 106, ) yet in all other cases the matters in con-
troversy must be heard in open court; for, publicity in judicial proceedings is of the
very greatest importance; " it is one of the best securities for the honest exercise of
a judge's duty, that he is to exercise that duty in public. " ( Wellesley v. Beaufort,
2 Russell, 9. ) Publicity is also one of the best shields which a skilful and impartial
judge can have against the assaults of party, of prejudice, or of intrigue. It is to
the enlightened and powerful public opinion to which the judges of Westminster
Hall are constantly exposed, and by which they are always held responsible and pro-
tected, that their great diligence as well as their luminous and impartial judgments
are to be ascribed. —(Dedans Virg. Con. of 1829, page 734. )

But whatever may be the composition or structure of a court of last resort, it is
important, that it should have assigned to it no duties but such as are properly appel-
late, as regards the substance of the case, or the points involving the merits which
have been controverted and adjudicated upon by the court of original jurisdiction.
According to a well regulated course of judicial proceeding the parties to a contro-
versy should have the means, and be allowed an opportunity of bringing before the
court of first resort all their allegations and proofs in any way pertinent to the sub-
ject in litigation. And, when the case has been so prepared for final decision, the
judgment should, as nearly as practicable, be pronounced upon the merits, or upon
those points on which the parties themselves have relied as involving the merits.

To allow the revising court to reverse the judgment of the tribunal of original
jurisdiction, because of any mere technical objection; would be, nine times in ten,
to put aside the real merits in dispute for the purpose of correcting a mere matter of
form which had either been deemed unworthy of attention in the court below, or
which might have been at once amended there had it been noticed in time; or to

86

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 680   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives