clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 615   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

THE CHANCELLOR'S CASE. 615

ancestors in like cases," had recourse to precedent as well as to
argument. In the English statute book they found the most une-
quivocal authority in favour of that judicial independency, to the
benefits of which, they thus contended the colonists were fully
entitled. By the famous English statute, passed in the year 1700,
(13 W. 3, c. 2,) for the better securing the rights and liberties of
the subject, it is enacted and declared in these words; " that
judges' commissions be made quamdiu se bene gesserint, (during
their good behaviour,) and their salaries ascertained and established;
but upon the address of both Houses of Parliament, it may be
lawful to remove them."(h)

(h) The Long Parliament, says the historian of the Commonwealth of England,
deserves to be for ever held in grateful remembrance for the great improvements we
derive from them in points most essential to the independence and freedom of man in
society. Among which is that which relates to the tenure by which the judges, who
are appointed to determine questions of law between man and man, and between the
sovereign and the subject, hold their offices. One of the earliest decisions of that
parliament was the vote condemning the judgment which had been given for the king
in the matter of ship money. And shortly after, January 1643, the house of Lords
appointed a committee to consider, among other things, of the judges holding their
places durante beneplacito. The next day they deputed seventeen of their body to
present their humble desire to the king, that the twelve judges, and the attorney of
the court of wards, might hold their places by patent, quamdiu se bene gesserint.
They accordingly waited on Charles with their request; to which he signified his
assent. Agreeably to this decision, in the petition of both houses of parliament pre-
sented to the king at Oxford, at the close of the first campaign of the civil war, they
make it one of their demands, that the twelve persons whom they name for the office
of judges, as well as all the judges of the same courts for the time to come, should
hold their places by letters patent quamdiu se bene gesserint.—(Godw. Com. Eng. b.
3, c. 29.)

Immediately after the king had been put to death it was enacted by the Long Par-
liament, that the commissioners of the great seal should also hold their offices during
good behaviour, (3 Godw. Com. Eng. 11.) But this important improvement as to the
tenure by which the judges and chancellor were to hold their offices, was, on the
restoration of Charles the second, entirely put aside, and nothing more said upon the
subject until some time after the English revolution of 1688, when it was enacted by
the statute of the 12 & 13 W. 3, c. 2, that the judges should hold their commissions
during good behaviour; still however leaving the Chancellor to hold, as formerly,
during pleasure.

In an opinion of the attorney and solicitor general D. Ryder, and W. Murray,
given on the 22d of June 1753, to the commissioners of trade and plantations respect-
ing an act passed by the General Assembly of Jamaica, providing, that all the judges
of the supreme court of judicature of the island should hold their offices quamdiu se
bene gesserint, they say, that " it directly affects the royal prerogative, in a of
great moment, and for which no occasion is pretended to be given, by the abuse of
any power committed to the governor; or, if there had been any, it would be much
more suitable to his majesty's honour and dignity, to reform it, by his own autho-
rity, folly sufficient for that purpose, in such manner, as to his royal wisdom should
seem meet, than by the interposition of an act of Assembly; nor does it appear to

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 615   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives