clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 180   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

180 JONES v. MAGILL

Mason, and has appropriated the proceeds of sale to his own use;
averring that he was well justified in doing so, &c.

These answers not having been filed during the sittings of a
term, the Chancellor on application passed the following order as
usual in such cases.

16th May, 1825.—BLAND, Chancellor.—In this case the defend-
ants, Thomas Magill, and Thomas N. Hording, having filed their
answers, and entered on the docket notice of a motion at the next
term to dissolve the injunction issued in the said case, it is ordered,
that the said motion stand for hearing at the next term, provided
a copy of this order be served on the complainant or her solicitor
before the twentieth day of June next.

A copy of this order having been served as required, and no
counsel appearing for the plaintiff, the motion to dissolve the
injunction was submitted on the part of the defendants, Magill
and Harding.

11th August, 1825.—BLAND, Chancellor.—An injunction, if
prayed for by the bill, may be granted in any case on the bill
alone, before a subpoena has been issued, or the party summoned;
except to stay proceedings at law in an action of ejectment by a
lessor, under the act of 4 Geo. 2, c. 28, s. 3.; or to recover mort-
gaged property under the act of 7 Geo. 2, c. 20, in which cases no
relief, or injunction can be granted before the defendant shall have
been summoned and heard.(a) But in no case can an injunction be
granted on the bill alone, unless it be verified by the affidavit of
the plaintiff; or of one of the plaintiffs, where there are more than
one; or, if the plaintiff be not a resident of the State, by the
affidavit of some third person, who especially shews how he hap-
pens to have a knowledge of the facts set forth in the bill; or by
some other testimony sufficient to induce the Chancellor to credit
the bill for the truth of its statements.(b)

In ordinary cases the injunction is simply granted as prayed;
and, in such cases, the defendant may, immediately upon filing his
answer, give notice to the plaintiff of a motion to dissolve the
injunction to be heard at the then next term. If the answer be filed

(a) Todd v. Pratt, 1 H. & J. 465; Eden. Inj. 85.—(b) Moore's Lessee v. Pearce,
3 H. & McH. 239; Schermehon v. L'Espenasse, 2 Dall. 360 *, 2 Harr. Pra, Cha.
221: 1 Cain. Ca. Err. 1.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Page 180   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives