clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 95   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

SMALLWOOD VS. HATTON. 95
when the authority of this court to issue and enforce the se-
questration is certainly not free from doubt, whilst the jurisdic-
tion of the Superior Court, in my opinion, cannot well be
questioned.
Under these circumstances, this return to the sequestration,
so far as the same relates to or affects the said William J. Ward,
must be quashed, but no costs will be allowed.
ALEXANDER, for Complainants.
TALBOTT and R. JOHNSON, for Defendants.
RICHARD L. SMALLWOOD
vs. SEPTEMBER TERM, 1853.
PETER D. HATTON.
[LOCATION OF BOND OF CONVEYANCE.]
A PARTY contracted to purchase for a gross sum, a tract of land containing one
hundred acres, "be the same more or less." HELD—that these words so far
qualified the representation of quantity as to preclude either party from any
just claim to relief on account of deficiency or surplus, unless it be of such a
character as to induce the belief of fraud or mistake.
The home line of tract of land as described in a bond of conveyance was,
"thence down said branch to the beginning." HELD—that this line must be run
with the meanders of the branch, and not in a straight line to the beginning.
An order referring the cause to the Auditor, with directions to report the an-
nual loss sustained by the plaintiff for the land claimed by him as embraced
within the uue location of Ills bond of conveyance and withheld by the defend-
ant, is not a final adjudication that he is entitled to such land; it does not so
settle the rights of the parties that an appeal would lie from it.
[The original bill in his case was filed by the complainant,
Smallwood, on the equity side of Charles County Court, on the
30th of August, 1837. It alleges that a judgment was rendered
against him at August term, 1836, of said County Court, in
favor of the defendant, Hatton, for $350 and costs, a short
copy of which is filed as an exhibit. That the cause of action
on which the same was rendered, was a single bill given by him

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 95   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives