clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 75   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

GIBSON VS. FINLEY. 75
PATRICK GIBSON
vs. DECEMBER TERM, 1853.
JOS. W. FINLEY AND OTHERS.
[EQUITABLE ASSIGNMENT.]
A DEBTOR residing in San Francisco sent, by letter, to his agent in Baltimore,
two drafts on New York and one on Baltimore, with request to collect them,
and pay the proceeds to certan creditors specified in the letter, with the res-
pective sums due each, and also gave those creditors orders on his agent for
the sums due them. One of these orders was payable out of the proceeds of
the New York drafts, the others out of both the New York and Baltimore
drafts, but none of them were accepted by the agent. The Baltimore draft
being dishonored, the holder of the order on the New York drafts claimed
the payment of it in full out of the proceeds thereof to the exclusion of the
others. HELD—That the proceeds of the New York drafts should be paid,
pro rata, among all the creditors mentioned in the letters.
It is the invariable effort of a court of equity to do equal justice to all by a
ratable distribution of the fund under its control, when not prevented from
so doing by the plain and explicit terms of the instrument with which it has
to deal.
Where an order is drawn for the whole of a particular fund it amounts to an
equitable assignment of that fund, and after notice to the drawee, it binds
the fund in his hands.
But where the order is drawn, either on a general or particular fund,/or apart
only, it does not amount to an assignment of that part, or give a lien as
against the drawee, unless he assent to the appropriation by an acceptance
of the draft, or an obligation to accept may be fairly implied from the cus-
tom of trade in the course of business between the parties, as a part of their
contract.
If a creditor ia pursuing two remedies when only one is open to him, chancery
may, upon application, compel him to elect, but until this is done, his pursuit
of both will not deprive him of either.
[Jos. W. Finley, formerly of the city of Baltimore, but at
the time of the filing of this bill, a resident of San Francisco,
California, being indebted to various persons in the former city,
transmitted in a letter, dated 31st of March, 1850, to Patrick
Gibson, of Baltimore, three several drafts, two of which amount-
ing to $7000 were drawn upon bankers in the city of New York,
and the other for $5000 upon A. J. Bowie, of Baltimore. This
letter, after specifying the drafts, requests Gibson to collect
them and distribute the proceeds among certain creditors, a list

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 75   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives