clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 590   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

590 INDEX.
SET-OFF— Continued.
tual, and due to and from the same persons in the same capacity.
Watkins vs. Zone, 13.
2. The complainant cannot set-off a claim for professional services ren-
dered the defendant and another jointly, or upon their Joint employ-
ment, against a judgment at law in favor of defendant alone, against
complainant and another. Ib.
3. Claims due by a guardian for property for which he received from the
mother of his wards, cannot be set off against claims due to the guar-
dian by the estate of their father. Gibbs vs. Cunningham, 322.
4. There must be reciprocity and mutuality in the right of set-off, and the
demands on the one side and the other must be in the same right. Id.
SETTLEMENTS.
1. A settlement between parties accompanied by a sealed obligation of
one to pay the balance found due by the settlement, must be regarded
as concluding all antecedent transactions between the parties, unless
it can be shown by proof that it was founded upon mistake or was
procured by fraud. Brown vs. Stewart, 368.
SETTLEMENTS—Continued.
See MISTAKE, 5, 6.
ANTENUPTIAL SETTLEMENT.
SLAVES.
See WILL ANC TESTAMENT, 12, 13.
STATUTE OF FRAUDS.
See RESULTING TRUST, 1.
PARENT AND CHILD, 2.
ANTENUPTIAL SETTLEMENT, 1.
STOCK.
See TRANSFER or.
SUBSTITUTION.
1. Where a mortgage was executed to secure the payment of certain pro-
missory notes, to be made by the mortgagors, and endorsed by the
mortgagees, and such notes were taken in exchange for those drawn
by other persons. HELD—
That the holders of the notes so given in exchange are entitled to
be substituted to all the rights of the makers thereof, to partici-
pate in the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises. Ohio
Life Ins. and Trust Co. vs. Winn & Ross, 253.
2. The principle of substitution places the substitute in all respects in the
place of the party for whom he is substituted. Ib.
See LIEN, 2.
LIMITATIONS, 4.
SUPPLEMENTAL BILL.
See PRACTICE IN CHANCERY, 26

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 590   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives