clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 528   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

528 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
Dilly & Heckrotte vs. Barard, 8 Gill & Johns., 171. I shall,
for these reasons, sign an order continuing the injunction.
[The commission to take testimony was subsequently returned
unexecuted, and the cause was, at December term, 1849, sub-
mitted for final decision, when the Chancellor passed the fol-
lowing order.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
This cause having been submitted on the part of the com-
plainant during the sittings of the term, is now laid before the
Chancellor without argument. And this court being of opinion,
for the reasons stated on the 5th of July, 1848, as the grounds
upon which the order of that date was passed, that upon the bill,
answers and the other proceedings then appearing in the cause,
the complainant was entitled to be relieved against the judg-
ment mentioned in the proceedings, and the commission to take
testimony then outstanding having been returned unexecuted.
It is, thereupon, this 17th day of January, 1850, by John
Johnson, Chancellor, and by the authority of this court ad-
judged, ordered, and decreed, that the judgment in the said
proceedings mentioned at the suit of Edward Lee, use of Charles
F. Mayer, the defendants in this cause, against Richard Igle-
hart, the complainants, recovered in Anne Arundel County
Court, at the October term thereof, in the year 1837, be, and
the same is hereby perpetually enjoined. And it is further
adjudged, ordered and decreed, by the authority aforesaid, that
the complainant recover his costs against the defendant in this
case, to be taxed by the Register.
[From this decree the defendant, Mayor, appealed; which
appeal is still pending.]
J. J. SPEED, for Complainant.
A. RANDALL, for Defendants.

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 528   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives