clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 453   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

CONNER VS. OGLE. 453
It is evident that some amount has been paid to B. Ogle, or to
S. Ridout, for him; what amount does not appear, but may
possibly be proved hereafter. He is also to be charged with
the value of the negroes attempted to be manumitted who were
above the legal age.
B. Ogle ought not to be charged for the advances made to
Mrs. Bevans, for the maintenance of herself and children be-
fore the settlement of the estate, and which have been allowed
by the Orphans Court. No other allowance for that period
having ever been made, it appearing to have been a reasonable
sum, and they being entitled to maintenance from the death of
Mrs. Ogle, after such a lapse of time and the death of the ex-
ecutor, it must be presumed that there was evidence of its pay-
ment and of the necessity of its being paid, although the Or-
phans Court had no right to allow it, it being paid in execution
of the trust, not of his duty as administrator. It is contended
by the complainants that it ought to have been paid out of the
interest, and that the principal of the estate could not be ap-
plied to that purpose.
The will actually authorizes the "trustees to apply the said
estate and the rents and profits thereof to the maintenance of
Mrs. Bevans, and her children," and although it appears from
the latter part of the will to have been the intention of the tes-
tatrix that the interest and profits alone should be applied to
that purpose, after they should have been received, I do not
see how, from the expressions of the will, we could refuse
to allow a payment made for that purpose out of the princi-
pal at that early period, and probably before any interest
could be made. Besides, the executor accounted for some
profits of the estate nearly enough to cover that payment, and
which, though certainly legal assets as to creditors, for such a
purpose as they have been applied to, ought to be considered
profits.
The residue of the plate bequeathed to the children of Mrs.
Bevans, vests, immediately on the death of Mrs. Ogle, in the
children then born. The power of the trustees to sell it for
their benefit, does not extend to the death of Mrs. Bevans, but
VOL. iv,—38

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 453   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives