clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 291   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

JAMISON VS. JAMISON. 291
than his means will justify in view of the demands upon him
for the support of his children.
After the filing of this answer no further steps appear to
have been taken in the cause until the 28th of July, 1845,
when a supplemental bill was filed, in which it was alleged that
since the separation, which still continued, the complainant had
several times sought a reconciliation, and offered again to live
with her husband, but that such, her offers, had been repulsed
and rejected by him, and that he has, for a considerable period.
failed to supply her with the necessary support and mainte-
nance, thereby rendering her dependent upon the benevolence
of friends for subsistence, ad that she has understood, and
charges, that he has resolved and declared his purpose to with-
hold from her all support. This bill likewise reiterates the
charge in the original bill, that the defendant was endeavoring.
by fraudulent conveyances and transfers of his property, to
prejudice and anticipate her claims upon him. That the de-
fendant will neither permit her to live with him, nor while
apart from him, and kept so apart by his own determination.
afford the maintenance which, as her husband, he owes her, and
the law exacts from him. This bill concludes with a prayer for
alimony and general relief.
The answer was filed to this bill on the 16th of March. 1846.
in which all its allegations are roundly denied.
A commission then issued, under which numerous deposi-
tions were taken, and much written evidence produced and
filed. It may not be considered necessary, and would certainly
occupy a great deal of time and space to refer particularly and
in detail to this proof. It may be sufficient to say that it does
not very clearly appear, which of these two parties was most to
blame for the discord which marred their domestic happiness
whilst they lived together as man and wife. That there were
faults on both sides, and that each occasionally yielded too far
to the dominion of temper and the spirit of dissension, seems to
be quite apparent from an examination of the proof.
It seems, however, to the court, that three propositions of
fact are sufficiently established by the evidence, and it will re-

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 291   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives