clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 247   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

SMITH VS. CHANEY. 247
[The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion of the
Chancellor.]
THE CHANCELLOR :
This case is brought before the court upon a motion to dis-
solve the injunction, and the solicitors of the parties have filed
written arguments in support of, and in opposition to, the mo-
tion.
The bill was filed on the 1st of December, in tho year 1845,
and alleges, in substance, that on or about the 1st of January,
1841, the complainants purchased of the defendants, Chaney
and wife, a parcel of land of which they alleged themselves to
be in possession, containing 181 acres and -^ of an acre, at the
price of $ 45 per acre, the purchase money amounting to
$8,184 S7, for which they gave their joint single bills to
Chaney, who delivered to the complainant, Anthony, oil the
land except eight and seven-eighths of an acre, and agreed, in
writing, to deduct from the purchase money the amount of said
deficiency, (the agreement being filed as an exhibit with the
bill,) and that the defendant and his wife executed to the com-
plainant, Anthony, a deed for the land, which deed is also
exhibited.
That the whole purchase money has been paid, except the
last single bill for $ 3,407 87 1/2 and upon that several pay-
ments have been made, amounting to $ 1,500, of which the
sum of $ 400 was paid on the 29th of April, 1844. That in
May, 1845, a Judgment was obtained on this single bill against
the complainants, without giving credit for the last payment of
$ 400, or the deficiency in the number of acres, in pursuance
of the agreement, and the complainants are informed, and be-
lieve, that the defendant, Chaney, is about to enforce, by exe-
cution, the payment of the whole amount of the judgment,
though they insist he never was in possession of the said eight
and seven-eighths of an acre, nor had title thereto, the same
being held and claimed by other persons.
Exhibits were filed with the bill, showing payments for
which credits were claimed, all of which were credited upon

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 247   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives