clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 241   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HIGGINS VS. HIGGtNS. 241
surviving her,) against Richard W. Higgins, her remaining child,
and his insolvent trustee, in which the proceedings in the first
of the other two cases are referred to, and the aid of the court
is asked in settling up the estate by sale or division thereof,
among the parties entitled, and upon the allegation that Richard
W. Higgins had, by selling and appropriating the money to his
own individual use, received a much larger share of the trust
estate than he would, upon a fair distribution thereof, be en-
titled to; the complainants pray that neither he nor his insol-
vent trustee, he having petitioned for the benefit of the insol-
vent laws in the year 1840, should be allowed to participate
therein.
The bill was answerd by the defendant, Higgins, and his per-
manent trustee, David Stewart. The answer of the latter
puts the complainants to the proof of the case, and pleads the
statute of limitations, against any claim against Richard W.
Higgins founded upon the alleged conversion by him of the
personal property to his own use.
The answer of Higgins', admits most of the material aver-
ments of the bill. And in his testimony, which was taken un-
der a commission, and order for his examination, subject to ex-
ceptions, and which, I think competent, though objected to, he
proved, that while acting as trustee and manager he sold a num-
ber of the negroes, whoso names and prices are stated, and that
the proceeds of sale so made by him, as of the crops made upon
the trust property, which consisted in part of real estate, he ap-
propriated to his own uso one-half, and the other half to the
support of the estate, and of the family, of whom his brothers
Joshua and James were members. He further stated, that
Joshua always objected to the sales made by him of the negroes.
And in a deposition made by the same witness, which it was
agreed should avail as if taken under the commission, he proved
that he had received the sum of about $700, as hire of a portion
of the trust negroes, of which he had appropriated at least four-
fifths to his own use.
Under an agreement for the purpose, the two cases founded
20*

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 241   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives