clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 235   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

McKIM VS. HANDY. 235
spirit of litigation at the expense of the trust estate, but it is
obvious that an order directing counsel fees to be paid out of it
would in many cases produce such a result.
It is believed, that no precedent can be found for the present
application. The rule is, no doubt, a general one, that when
personal representatives, and other trustees, are entitled to
costs out of the fund, the costs will be taxed as between soli-
citor and client, and it is said in the books, that when a trustee
finds it necessary to employ or advise with counsel, as to the
proper management of the trust estate, he will, when his ac-
counts come to he taken, he allowed under the head of just al-
lowances, such reasonable fees as he may have paid. foams
vs. Young, 10 Ves., 184: 3 Daniell's Ch. Pr., 1586. The rule
with regard to taxation of the costs of the heir a,t law, who is
brought before the court in the case of a. charity, can have no
application. It seems to be settled, that in such a case, if he
makes no improper point, he will be allowed his costs as between
solicitor and client. Currie vs. Pye, 17 Ves; 462. And the
practice in England, upon creditor's bills, of making this favor-
able taxation for the benefit of the suing creditor, when the es-
tate has proved insufficient, seems equally inapplicable, even if
such practice obtained here, which, however, is not understood
to be the case.
Considering this application, then, unsupported by precedent,
and believing the granting it would Lave an injurious tendency,
I shall dismiss the petition, but without cost, as it was a point
which, under the circumstances, was proper to bring to the
notice of the court.
[A further opinion was delivered in this case on the 5th of
January, 1849, upon the petition of John M. Duncan. The
facts are stated in the opinion.]
THE CHANCELLOR :
Tlio question now presented arises upon the petition of John
M. Duncan, administrator of Ann S. Duncan.
The deceased was one of" the grandchildren of the late John

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 235   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives