clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 23   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HOPKINS VS. McELDERY. 23
evidence that inquiries had been made into the extent of the
assets of the assignors, or the extent of their liabilities, by
inquiring into which alone could any judgment have been
formed, or notice be attributed." Nor is there any other proof
in this case bringing home to Jerome a knowledge of the in-
solvent condition of Thomas, sufficiently pregnant to overcome
his direct and emphatic denial of such knowledge in his answer.
I am therefore of opinion, that the complainant is not entitled
to relief, but there is quite enough in the cause to protect him
against a decree for costs, and accordingly, in dismissing his
bill, the parties respectively will be required to pay their own
costs.
HENRY P. BROOKS and LEVIN GALE, for Complainants.
C. H. PITTS, for Respondents.
[An appeal was taken by the complainants, which is still
pending.]
SAMUEL HOPKINS,
vs. MARCH TERM, 1851.
HENRY McELDERY.
[MOTION TO BRING MONEY INTO COURT.]
THOSE who make the motion to have money brought into Court, must show
that they have an interest in the sum proposed to be called in, and that
he who holds it in his possession, has no equitable right to it whatever,
and the facts on which these positions are based must be found in the case
as it then stands, either admitted or so established as to be open to no
further controversy at any subsequent stage of the proceedings.
An answer exhibited accounts, showing a balance due complainant, which
defendant says he was willing to settle, but the former refused to receive,
and filed his bill, and the defendant believed, and still believes, that
balance to be too large, and insists that he is now entitled to have certain
sums credited with which he had not been credited in the accounts. HELD
—That these admissions were not sufficient to authorize an order to bring
the balance into Court.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 23   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives