clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 109   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

MAYO VS. MAYO. 109
There was also a provision that the son might, should he feel
"himself competent and so disposed, by his will, give all the prop-
erty which he might take under the will of his father to his
sister, Mrs. Mayo, or to any one or more of her children or
their descendants. The testator also declared in the restrictive
provisions of his will in regard to his son, his intention was as
effectually, as the law would allow, to assure to him an ample
independent support during his natural life, so that it may not
be lost by his imprudence, or the misconduct of others, giving
him at the same time something to bestow upon the nearest and
most natural objects of his affection.
There being no provision in the will, or in any other instru-
ment of writing, for the appointment of a successor to execute
the trust created by the paper of December, 1848, a bill was
filed in this court on the 21st of January last by the testator's
daughter, Mrs. Mayo, and her infant children, suing by their
next friend, against Isaac Mayo, the husband and executor of
the will, (the widow of the testator jointly appointed with him
having renounced,) William G. Bland, and the banks, praying
for the appointment of a new trustee, that the executor may
account for the dividends which may have been received, and
remain unpaid and for general relief.
William G. Bland, by his answer, elected to take under the
will, and insisted that the other parties interested should be put
to their election also, the court making an election for the in-
fants. It was also stated in the answer, and is conceded, that
certain of the dividends which had been declared on the bank
stocks, had not been paid to the said William G. Bland, and
that a portion thereof so remaining unpaid were declared and
became due after the date of the will. With respect to these
dividends, the answer of William G. Bland submitted whether
they were to be held in trust for or paid over to him, but in
either event he claimed interest upon them from the periods
when they respectively became due, except as to the two first
dividends in the Bank of Baltimore, as to which he stated he
had agreed with the deceased in his lifetime to waive all claim
for interest before the 1st of November, 1845.
9*

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 109   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives