clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 599   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INDEX. 599
PRACTICE IN CHANCERY.—Continued.
amount found to be due by the former. Upon a bill by complainant at-
tacking this settlement, it was decided, that it was not fraudulent in fact,
and was allowed to stand; but leave was granted to surcharge and falsify
the accounts upon which it was based, and they were accordingly correct-
ed, and the amount due greatly reduced. HELD—
That the complainant has the right to demand the whole amount of
stock transferred by him, upon his paying the amount really ascer-
tained to be due from him, such transfer to stand merely security
for the sum actually due. 16,
67. Where a term intervenes after the passage of an order, it is considered as
enrolled, and cannot be reheard upon petition; the only remedy in such
cases, is by bill of review for error appearing on its face, or new matter
discovered since. Notley Young's Estate, 461.
68. The averment that bis vendor was, at the time of the execution of the con-
veyance, seized, or pretended to be seized, and was in possession of the
premises conveyed, is indispensably necessary to a plea by a defendant
that he is a lama fide purchaser without notice. Ringgold vs. Bryan, 488.
69. An answer responsive to the bill cannot be overruled, unless contradicted
by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one sustained by pregnant cir-
cumstances; circumstances standing alone will Dot destroy the answer.
70. A conveyance defectively executed, may be set up as a valid contract in
equity, and a confirmatory deed will give it validity. Ib.
l»g vs. Brown Sr Brannan, 521.
See CREDITOR'S BILL, 2, 3.
SET-OFF.
CHARGES UPON LANDS DEVISED.
PART PERFORMANCE.
MULTIFARIOUSNESS.
APPEAL.
COMMISSIONS TO TRUSTEES.
SALES ft TRUSTEES.
JURISDICTION.
MORTGAGE, &C., 2.
GUARDIAN AND WARD, B, 7. I
IMPROVEMENTS, &c., 1, 2.
LUNATIC, LUNACY. ,
RECEIVERS.
INJUNCTION.
RULE FOR ASCERTAINING PRESENT VALUE OF LITE ESTATE.
MERGER, 5,
PARTITION. .
EVIDENCE, 2.
INSOLVENT DEBTOR, B. TRUSTS, 3, 4.
PRINCIPAL AND SURETY.
' See SUBSTITUTION, RIGHT or, 1 to 5.
PROOF OF CLAIMS.
. See PRACTICE IN CHANCERY, 34, ?5.
PURCHASE.
See REMAINDERMEN.

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 599   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives