clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 538   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

538 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
in legal form, he will not be discountenanced by the Court, when seeking
to redeem, because of the inadequacy of the price paid by him. Where,
under such circumstances, he runs the risk of buying a worthless title, he
will be allowed the benefit of his purchase, if it results advantageously.
[The bill in this case was filed upon the 7th of August, 1849.
It alleges that Gustavus R. Barber, being seized of a tract of
land called " the President," lying in Anne Arundel County,
and of certain lots in the city of Annapolis, executed to Ann
Ridgely, now deceased, a mortgage of the said property, by deed
dated 10th January, 1840, to secure the sum of $2,000, due by
him to her. That on the 20th of January, 1840, the said Ann
Ridgely assigned the said mortgage to David Ridgely, by deed
of that date, reserving to herself the interest accruing on the
said debt, which was still to be paid to her, as provided in the
original mortgage. That David Ridgely being about to borrow
$2,000 from the Farmers' Bank of Maryland, in order to in-
duce Robert Welch, of Ben., and John W. Whittington, to
become endorsers on his note in bank for that amount, conveyed
the said assigned mortgage and debt to the said Welch and
Whittington, by deed dated 4th September, 1840, in trust to
hold the same as security to them from any loss by reason of
said endorsement, and in further trust to apply the moneys
which might be received by them under said assignment, after
satisfying the life estate reserved, as aforesaid, to Ann Kidgely,
to the payment of the said note, and the residue, if any, to the
said David, and in further trust, to reconvey the same if the
said David should pay the note. That the note thus endorsed
was discounted by the Bank, on the 8th of September, 1840,
and renewed from time to time until the 5th day of June, 1842,
when it was protested for $1,550, the sum of $450 having been
paid on account thereof by the said David. That at the Oc-
tober Term, 1843, of Anne Arundel County Court, judgments
were recovered against the said Welch and Whittington by the
Bank, for the balance due on said note—the said David having
left the State of Maryland. That after the protest of the said
note, the said David, on the 27th day of December, 1842, as-
signed, in writing, to George E. Franklin, all his remaining

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 538   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives