clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 527   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WHITE VS. DONNELL AND HOWARD. 527
[The facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of the
Chancellor.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
The questions in controversy, raised by the pleadings in
this case are, by an agreement filed on the 16th inst., reduced
to two, and these are, first, as to the validity of the claim pre-
ferred in the bill, for interest on the sum of $20,000, from the
25th of April, 1839, the day of the death of Mrs. Ann Don-
nell, to the 9th of June, 1842, when the said amount of
$20,000 in property was set aside for the complainant, Mary; ,
secondly, as to the right of the defendant, Donnell, on the
settlement of accounts with the defendant Howard, as shown
by an Exhibit filed with the answer of the latter, to be credited
for interest as therein charged, amounting to $361 33 on the
money advanced by said Donnell, to pay one-half of the com-
missions and expenses for dividing the estate of E. J. Williams,
and setting apart the $20,000 in property, as aforesaid, for
the complainant Mary. By a supplemental agreement, the
question first submitted was so far modified, as to leave the
complainant's counsel at liberty to claim a proportion of the
rents and profits of the estate of Mrs. Ann Donnell, received
by the defendant Donnell, from the time of her death to the
9th of June, 1849, if the Court shall be of opinion that any of
the averments of the bill raise such a claim. And it was
further agreed that the complainant, Mary, notified the trustee
Howard, in January, 1841, and afterwards, of her claim for
interest on the $20,000.
Whether the complainants are entitled to interest on the
sum of $20,000, or to a proportion of rents and profits, in
lien of interest, assuming the case made by the bill would
justify a decree of the latter description, in the face of an
exception denying such right, depends upon the true construc-
tion and legal effect of certain marriage articles entered into
by Mrs. Ann Williams, the mother of the complainant Mary,
and the defendant Donnell, on the 16th of September, 1849,
Just prior to their marriage. By these articles, Mrs. Williams

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 527   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives