clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 515   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

GLENN VS. WOOTTEN. 515
for more than three weeks, she postponed the sale thereof, in
consequence of the inclemency of the weather, until the 17th
of December, 1850, when the same was set up at public sale,
on the premises, and the whole tract, containing 10851/2 acres,
was sold to Mrs. Mary Hall, for $13 621/2 per acre, being in
all $14,489 95, she being the highest bidder therefor.
To this sale, Albert A. Berry, a creditor to a large amount
of said William T. Wootten, deceased, filed objections, because
1st. The whole tract was put up for sale, and sold together,
whereas it was capable of advantageous division, and if so
divided would have sold for much more.
2d. Sufficient and reasonable notice was not given of the
time, place, manner, and terms of sale, by advertisement in
papers, or otherwise.
3d. Many persons desirous of purchasing parcels thereof,
were kept from the sale by a report that the whole was to be
sold in a lump.
4th. The widow's dower should have been first assigned, so
that purchasers might know in what parcel she would hold the
same.
5th. The sale made was done collusively, and with the view
of being purchased at a depreciated value, for the benefit of
the family of the deceased, and the injury of exceptant and his
other creditors.
6th. The land only sold for $13 62|- per acre, being not
one-third of its fair value, when if the same had been offered
in parcels, it would readily have brought from $30 to $40 per
acre.
Depositions were taken in support and in opposition to these
exceptions, the purport of which sufficiently appears in the
opinion of the Chancellor.]
THE CHANCELLOR :
This case is submitted upon exceptions to the sale reported
by the trustee, Mrs. Margaret Wootten, and the depositions
and arguments, in writing, of the solicitors of the parties, have
been read and carefully considered by the Court.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 515   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives