clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 500   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

500 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
stated, that the Court may see that the apprehensions of irreparable mis-
chief are well founded.
The fact that the injury complained of is one that may be continued, does
not prove that it is not susceptible of adequate compensation in damages
by an action at law.
The permitting a race or ditch for conducting water to remain out of repair,
so that the water filtrates through the bank, thereby flooding and injuring
the meadow of the complainant, is not such an injury as will authorize
the interference of equity by way of injunction.
If actions had been brought at law and damages recovered, and defendant
still persisted in permitting the ditch to remain in a defective condition,
equity would then interfere by injunction, because it would be shown that
the Courts of Law -were inadequate to afford relief.
If the race was in as good condition as it was during the life of the person
under whom both parties claim, or if the injury complained of was caused
by the act of complainant himself, he could not have redress in any Court
upon any principle.
[The bill in this case was filed upon the equity side of Bal-
timore County Court, and alleges that Samuel Owings, by his
will, devised his dwelling and plantation, lying across Owings's
Valley, in Baltimore County, in equal portions to his daugh-
ters, Deborah, Hannah, and Urath, giving the lower or eastern
portion, on which was his house, barn, saw-mill, and other im-
provements, to Deborah. That these daughters, and the other
heirs-at-law of the said Samuel, united in an amicable partition
of his estate, and conveyed to each other their respective por-
tions of it. That by this partition Deborah received the farm
lying east, embracing the dwelling, mill, and barn, as the tes-
tator desired. Hannah, then a widow, named Hannah Ballard,
received the farm lying west and westwardly, and Urath the
farm lying highest up the Valley, and farthest west. That
Deborah married the defendant, Henry Stevenson, with whom
she now lives on her said farm. That Urath intermarried with
complainant, who, in virtue thereof, became possessed of her
said farm, and in 1840 he purchased the intervening farm of
Hannah. That these three farms, extending across Owings's
Valley, each contain many acres of valuable meadow land, and
are all intersected by the stream of "Jones's Falls." That
about twenty years before his death, said Samuel Owings having

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 500   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives