clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 484   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

484 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
him in the County Court), as a feme sole, and for which, as
insisted by the plaintiff, her property to a certain amount is
responsible under said Act.
It further appears that on the said 25th of October, but
before the attachment was levied, Anne E. Seymour and her
husband, Edward Seymour, executed a bill of sale to the
defendant Boulding, of the property proposed to be affected by
the attachment, in trust, to pay the debts of the husband and
wife, and that on the day following, they made to the same
party a second bill of sale for the same purpose.
Under these circumstances, the present bill was filed on
the equity side of Baltimore, County Court by Crane, the
attaching creditor, and Armstrong and Caton, in behalf of
themselves and such other of the creditors of Anne E. Seymour
as may make themselves parties by contributing to the expense
of the suit, in which, after giving a detailed statement of the
facts, and charging that the bills of sale were fraudulent, and
designed to hinder, delay, and obstruct the complainant and
the other creditors of Anne E. Seymour, and further charging
that said Seymour and wife and Boulding are not, nor is either
of them, so solvent and responsible as to make the property,
consisting of merchandise, safe in their hands, and that said
merchandise is in great danger of being wasted and improperly
disposed of, in which event the creditors of Mrs. Seymour
would be without remedy or recourse, they prayed the Court
to interpose by injunction for its preservation, and that a
receiver should be appointed to take possession of and sell the
same.
The County Court upon this bill granted the injunction and
appointed a receiver, and answers having been filed by the
defendants, and motions made to dissolve the injunction and
discharge the receiver, and the record being now in this Court
under the provisions of the Act of Assembly in such ease made
and provided, and counsel having been heard in support of
and in opposition to the motion, the proceedings have been
duly considered.
The answer of the defendants, after denying the fraud

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 484   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives