clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 478   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

478 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
such persons as he by will may appoint, and in case of failure of such ap-
pointment, then to his heirs-at-law. HELD—
That this deed is fraudulent and void against the creditors of the grantor,
both existing and subsequent, because of the trusts in it in his favor.
[The deed attacked by the proceedings in this case, was
executed by the defendant, Henry Hook, on the 2d of June,
1842, and conveys to the grantee, James H. Miller, a certain
lot of ground in the city of Baltimore, and certain leasehold
interests in other lots particularly described, with the buildings
and improvements thereon, " and also all and singular the
plate, household and kitchen furniture" of the grantor, "in
trust, for the use of the said Henry Hook, and Sarah Hook,
his wife, for and during the term of their joint natural lives,
and for the use of the survivor during his or her life, with
power of absolute disposal by them jointly, or by the said
Henry Hook solely, if he shall survive the said Sarah, as is
hereinafter expressed. And from and after the decease of the
longest liver" of them, as to so much " as may remain undis-
posed of by deed or contract, as hereinafter provided for in
trust for such person or persons, or for such uses and purposes
aa the said Henry Hook by his last will and testament, 'duly
executed, shall have named, limited and appointed in relation
thereto. But in default of such nomination, limitation, and
appointment, then in trust for such person or persons, as
would, by the now existing laws of the State of Maryland, be
the heirs of the said Henry Hook, to take an estate in fee
simple in lands by descent from him. But upon this further
trust, nevertheless, to suffer and permit the said Henry Hook
and Sarah his wife, jointly during their joint lives, and the said
Henry Hook solely, if he shall survive the said Sarah, to sell,
convey, and dispose of absolutely for ever, for such price or
consideration as to them or him may seem fit, the whole, or
any part, or parts, of the trust estate aforesaid, and the con-
sideration or proceeds thereof to receive, and the same to ap-
propriate, apply, and dispose of, in such manner as they or he,

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 478   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives