clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 44   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

44 HIGH COURT Of CHANCERY.
of the solicitors of the parties upon exceptions to the report-of
the Auditor, the proceedings and the notes of counsel have
been read and considered.
The testator, Patrick Ward, by his will, duly executed in
March, 1831, devised and bequeathed to his wife, Lilly Ward,
his whole estate, real, personal, and mixed, with some inconsi-
derable exceptions, for life, with remainder absolutely to his
children, and the children of a deceased daughter, naming
them, to be equally divided into three parts, so that the chil-
dren of his deceased daughter should receive one equal third
part; and by a codicil, executed on the same day, in which,
after reciting that by his will he had given and bequeathed his
estate of every description to his wife, he says, " But now I
do hereby revoke and annul the same, in part, and hereby give
and bequeath, from and immediately after my decease, all
the rents, issues, and profits of my two-story brick house in
Exeter street, in Baltimore, No. 42, to my said two surviving
children, Mary Ann and Edwin, the same to be applied to-
wards their support and education;" and the. question is,
whether the codicil not only revokes the will, so far as the life
estate given to the testator's widow is concerned, but whether
it doea not give to his two surviving children the absolute and
entire interest in said house ?
The will and the codicil are to be construed together as one
instrument, and are to be reconciled as far as possible, though,
of course, if irreconcilable, the codicil, as the last indication
of the testator's mind, must prevail. Lee vs. Pindle, 12 G.
& J., 288. And regarding the will and codicil as one instru-
ment, an exposition of it is to be made, to attain, if possible,
the intention, which is the first and great object of inquiry.
The testator in this case, by his will, had given his wife a
life estate, with remainder to his surviving children, and the
children of a deceased daughter, and prescribed the propor-
tions in which they should take. In his codicil, he says he
revokes this devise to his wife, in part, and he gives the rents,
issues, and profits of this property, immediately after his de-
cease, to his two surviving children, the game to be applied

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 44   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives