clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 357   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HUTCHINS VS. HUTCHINS. 357
THE CHANCELLOR:
This case having been submitted upon exceptions to the
report of the Auditor, the proceedings have been read and
considered.
It is assumed that the property sold by the trustee consisted
of that portion of the real estate of Jarrett Hutchins, which he
acquired under the will of his father, Thomas Hutchins, lying
in Baltimore County, and that the land lying in Harford
County remains unsold. The will describes the land in Bal-
timore County as containing one hundred and twenty-six and
one-quarter acres, and the trustee sold. one hundred and
twenty-six and one-half acres. It is, therefore, assumed to be
the same land, and, indeed, such I understood to be the state-
ment of the solicitors of the parties, when they appeared
before me.
The devise to Jarrett Hutchins is in the following terms: "I
will and bequeath unto my son Jarrett, my farm, whereon I now
reside, lying and being in My Lady's Manor, containing one hun-
dred and twenty-six and one-quarter acres, more or less. Also,
my farm in Harford County, to him and his heirs and assigns
for ever, on condition that he, the said Jarrett Hutchins, shall
keep or otherwise maintain his mother during life, or so long
as she may remain single; and it is, moreover, my desire that
the said Jarrett do and shall provide for my daughters, Eliza-
beth and Susan, good and sufficient boarding and comfortable
clothing, so long as they may remain single."
It is not denied that this clause in the will operates as a,
charge upon the real estate devised to the son of the testator,
and since the case of Tolson vs. Tolson et al., 10 G. & J., 159,
it would be impossible to deny it. And as the decree in this
case reserves to the said Elizabeth and Susan Hutchins the
right to claim such proportion of the proceeds of the Bale as
they may be entitled to in lieu of such charge, the Court is
now called upon to say what that proportion will be.
The evidence shows that the board and clothing of Elizabeth
Hutchins is worth not less than $150 in Baltimore County per
annum, and that she is about Seventy years of age. - Taking
VOL. III—24

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 357   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives