clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 321   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ABERCROMBIE VS. RIDDLE. 321
Where stocks are sold before the dividends are declared, the latter pass by
the sale, and transfer to the purchaser.
The stocks in this case were sold shortly before the day for declaring divi-
dends had arrived. This sale was made by consent of all parties, includ-
ing the assignee of the life interest in them. HELD—that the assignee
was not entitled to any allowance out of the proceeds of sale, on account
of dividends which had accrued up to the day of sale.
The hypothesis, that the value of the stock was enhanced in precise propor-
tion to the amount of the dividends which had accrued up to the day of
sale, rests upon a foundation of too much uncertainty, to justify the Court
in making it the basis of ite judgment.
[In this case, by the consent of all parties interested, a
decree was passed for the sale of 650 shares of bank stock,
standing in the name of trustees, in trust for the use of Mary
F. Abercrombie for life, with remainder to her children. Mrs.
Abercrombie had assigned her interest in said stock to the
Baltimore Life Insurance Company, which consented to the
sale. The sales amounted to $29,488 13, and the cause being
referred to the Auditor, he stated four accounts distributing
the proceeds, marked A, B, C, D, and E. In account A, he
assigned to the Insurance Company, as the assignee of Mrs.
Abercrombie's life interest in the stock, one-third of the net
proceeds of sale. This allowance was made according to
the rule of Court, and the age of the tenant for life, and
amounted to $9,362 74. Account B differs only in adding
five years to the age of the tenant for life, on account of her
infirm health, in making the allowance to her assignee, which
by this account amounted to $8,426 46.
Accounts C and D were stated under instructions from the
Solicitor of the Insurance Company. In the former (account
0), the proportions of the dividends of the stock which had
accrued to the day of sale, were assigned to said Company,
amounting to $1,006 61, and the allowance for the said life
estate was calculated according to the principal sum, of which
the income of the stock sold is the interest at six per cent.,
and amounted by this calculation to $12,292 27. Account D
differs from account 0, in that the allowance for the life estate
Was made according to the Carlisle tables, taking the income

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 321   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives