clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 286   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

286 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
committee, and a strong ground must be shown before it will
be disregarded. In the matter of Mary Livingston, a lunatic,
1 Johns. Ch. Rep., 436. Ex parte Cockayne, 7 Ves., 591.
Ex parte Le Heup, 18 Ves; 227. If in this case there exists
any ground for supposing that Mr. Ellicott, in managing the
estate of this unfortunate lady, would consult rather the interests
of the persons who may succeed to it upon her death than her
comfort and welfare, the Court would undoubtedly give full
weight to that consideration. But no such ground appears.
On the contrary, forming an opinion on the evidence, there is
every reason to believe he will discharge his trust with fidelity,
alike to the lunatic and to those who, upon her death, may be
entitled to call upon him for an account of his stewardship.
The Court might, in the exercise of its discretion, associate
another with him in the trust, but this is not often done; and
there are reasons which frequently, and perhaps in this case
especially, render it inexpedient. It has been suggested, and
authorities cited to show, that persons embarrassed by pecu-
niary difficulties, and who, under the pressure of such difficul-
ties, might be tempted to use the money or estate of the lunatic
improperly, are not fit to be placed in offices of this description.
That such a consideration is entitled to weight, is shown by
the case of Ex parte Proctor, 1 Swanston, 581, 533; and lam
free to say, that if I could see in this evidence any reasonable
ground for apprehending that Mr. Ellicott would be likely to
employ the money which may come to his hands, as committee
of this estate, in his own affairs, or for his own benefit, it would
operate with powerful force against his appointment. But I
can see no such ground in the proof; and besides, the very
character of the order of appointment, and the security which
will be taken for the performance of the duties of the commit-
tee, render any misapplication of the trust estate extremely
improbable. The committee, by the terms of the order, is re-
quired to return an inventory of the lunatic'8 estate within six
months from the date of the order, and to account for his re-
ceipts and expenditures once in each year, and oftener, if
required.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 286   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives