clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 230   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

280 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
EARLE AND McNIER
vS. JULY TERM, 1849.
DAWES ET AL.
[ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN—CONSTRUCTION W DEEDS—CONDITION PRECEDENT.]
A WOMAN died intestate, leaving an illegitimate son and other children born
in lawful wedlock. Held, that by the Act of 1826, ch. 158, the illegitimate
son was entitled to share equally with the other children in the mother's
estate.
A deed recited that the grantor was anxious to secure to the grantee his
undivided interest in certain land, •upon condition that he was to retain
the use and enjoyment of it during his life, and in consideration of these
premises, and of natural love and affection, conveyed the property to the
grantee upon condition that the grantor died before the grantee, and not
otherwise, with habendum to the grantee and her heirs, subject to the con-
dition aforesaid. The grantor survived the grantee. HELD—that this was
clearly a condition precedent, and not being fulfilled, nothing passed by
the deed.
Whether a condition be precedent or subsequent is always a question of
intent, and it is immaterial where the clause creating the condition be
placed in the deed.
Conditions precedent must be punctually and literally performed before the
estate can vest.
A Court of Equity will never vest an estate where, by reason of a condition
precedent, it will not vest at law.
[The facts of the case necessary for an understanding of
the Chancellor's opinion are sufficiently set out therein.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
This case, which is submitted upon arguments, in writing, of
the solicitors of the parties, presents two questions.
The first depends upon the construction of the Act of 1825,
ch. 156, relating to illegitimate children. It appears that the
defendant, B. M. Dawes, sonof Mrs. Dawes, is an illegitimate
child, and that his mother, Elizabeth Dawes, died intestate,
leaving this son and other children born in lawful wedlock,
and the question now raised is, whether this illegitimate son is
entitled to participate in the estate of his mother as co-heir
with the other children.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 230   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives