clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 111   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

BULLETT VS. WORTHINGTON. 111
consisting of negroes, &c. Some of the negroes died and some
he sold to Georgia. The residue, together with all his other
personal property, he conveyed by mortgage to Samuel Worth-
ington, on or about the —— day of June, 1826. That at the
time he executed the mortgage, he was largely indebted to
Samuel Worthington, and that when he executed the-absolute
conveyance, he received from him the further sum of $600 in
cash. That his real estate was mortgaged for about ten thou-
sand dollars." In addition to the evidence obtained from Wal-
ter Worthington, in this way he was examined under the com-
mission issued in this case, and upon the cross-examination he
says, "the mortgaged lands were sold to pay the mortgage
debts, and did not sell for quite enough to pay them."
An agreement has been filed by which it appears, that one
of the claims of the suing creditors, accrued as early as the
5th of May, 1822, and a bond is filed dated the 8th of July,
1822, in which Walter Worthington united with his son Charles
as his surety in the penalty of $5000, conditioned for the per-
formance by Charles of his duty as trustee under a decree of
Baltimore County Court. The claims of the other suing cre-
ditors accrued on the 2d of June, 1825, the 8th of May, 1825,
the 2d of June, 1825, and the 2d of February, 1827. Six of
these creditors obtained judgments against Walter Worthing-
ton at September term, 1826, and March term, 1827. Their
claims remain unsatisfied, and the question is whether the
deed from Walter Worthington to his son Samuel, so far as it
is a voluntary one, shall be allowed to stand and be maintained
to their prejudice ? That these creditors have in point of fact
been delayed and hindered by these deeds is quite apparent;
and it is very certain, whatever may have been the estimate
made by the grantor, at the time of their execution, of his
pecuniary condition, that he was greatly mistaken. And it is
also very certain that the residue of his real estate was encum-
bered before the date of the conveyance from Walter to Samuel
Worthington, as he himself states that the mortgage to John
Tolly Worthington was executed in April, 1823.
I do not therefore think that the defendants have succeeded

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 111   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives