clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 58   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

68 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
considerations. Without going into any further observations,
I have come to the conclusion that the injunction should be
continued; and shall pass an order accordingly; and feel the
less reluctance in doing so, as a speedy and effectual remedy
exists for correcting my error, if I have committed one.
[Upon an appeal taken from this order, it was affirmed by
the Court, of Appeals; and the views of the Chancellor sustained
in a learned and able opinion of the court, delivered by his
Honor, Judge Frick. The deed of trust to Winn and Ross,
which the Chancellor intimates, upon the authority of the case
of McCall vs. Hinckley, 4 Gill, 128, might be sustained, was
decided by the court to be fraudulent and void; and thus the
question of the validity of such conveyances in this state has
been finally determined.]
ALEXANDER and DULANEY for Complainants.
NELSON and DONALDSON for Defendants.
STEWART, PERMANENT TRUSTEE OF •
JOHN L. AND WILLIAM L. HAM-
MOND
vs. JULY TERM, 1847.
THE UNION BANK OF MARYLAND, AND
McCORMICK, ADMINISTRATOR OF
McCORMICK.
[INSOLVENT DEBTOR—UNDUE PREFERENCE.]
John & William Hammond, partners, being indebted to the Union Bank in the
sum of (5000, on the 21st of February, 1832, gave their note for the same at
sixty days, in the partnership name, payable to the Bank in its corporate
name, which was secured by the pledge of sixty-four shares of the stock of the
bank, standing in the name of James McCormick. This not being paid at
maturity, and the partnership in the meantime being dissolved, on the 24th
of April following, they gave a new note, in their individual names, payable C
the cashier of the bank at twenty-eight days, which became due on the 25th

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 58   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives