clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 499   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

CONKLING VS. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY. 499
Assuming that the contributors and the corporation can be regarded as part-
ners, still E. G., who is only a Judgment creditor of one of the partners,
cannot be preferred to the contributors who are creditors of the partner-
ship for advances made to it.
The sale, under the fi. fa.. could only transfer the interest of the corporation, at
the date of the judgment, and would be subject to all judgments, liens and
outstanding equities existing against it, anterior to that time.
The excess of one partner's advances over those of the other, constitutes a
preferred claim upon the partnership property, or its proceeds, as against
the individual creditors of the bankrupt partner.
[The bill was filed on the 24th of May, 1843, by the com-
plainants, in behalf of themselves and all others interested un-
der a deed of trust therein mentioned; and states that the cor-
porate body then styled the Washington Medical College of
Baltimore, but now, (by virtue of the act of 1838, ch. 138,)
styled the Washington University of Baltimore, did, by a deed,
dated 24th of July, 1835, convey to the complainants, Conkling,
Frasier, Corner and Mayer, the leasehold piece of ground therein
described, in trust to secure payment of dividends and principal to
those who should advance to said corporate body sums of money,
part of a proposed sum of $50,000, towards erecting a building,
the Washington Medical College of Baltimore, on said ground ;
said persons to be identified by holding certificates of indebt-
edness of said corporate body, in form as specified in said deed.
That the contemplated building was to be used by said corpor-
ate body as a college for medical instruction, and as a hospital
and lunatic asylum. That the complainants, with the excep-
tion of Mayer, contributed sums to the amount of $30,000,
within the terms of said deed of trust, with which, and the con-
tributions of others, a building as aforesaid was erected on said
piece of ground, which was used by said corporate body, from
its completion, for at least seven years, and until the sale herein-
after mentioned, for the medical instruction aforesaid, and as a
hospital and lunatic asylum, during which period, said corporate
body derived from said building, and such use thereof, large
issues and profits, from which dividends, within the purport and
intent of said deed of trust, should have been paid to (he com-
plainants upon their advances, but that no such dividends have

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 499   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives