clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 423   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

MURRAY VS. FEINOUR. 423
daughter and her children, to a trustee, without delegating to
any one a power to change the investment. When he pur-
chased the stocks does not appear, but enough appears in the
evidence to show, that there has been little fluctuation in their
intrinsic value for a long period of time, at least with reference
to the stock in the Marine Bank, the dividends having aver-
aged six per cent. for the last twenty years, clear of taxes and
assessments. And it further appears from the evidence of the
cashier, that the condition of the bank is now a safe one.
There is no proof either way with regard to the other stocks.
Now the proposition, is, to sell out these stocks without alle-
gation or proof of their insecurity, and to invest the proceeds
in the improvement of real estate, or in disincumbering it of
liens now resting upon it. But it is supposed to be clear upon
authority, that trustees have no power to do this, unless a spe-
cial authority for so doing is conferred upon them by the trust
instrument. Earl of Winchelsea vs. Nrocliff, 1 Vernon, 435,
and if the trustees have no such power, unless the instrument
creating the trust confers it upon them, the court should hesi-
tate to give the power, unless, impelled to do so by considera-
tions of the most pressing character.
There is, however, another objection to the arrangement pro-
posed in this casp, which strikes me as of great force. The
property proposed to be disincumbered and improved out of
the proceeds of the stocks, is not held subject to the same
trusts, in all respects, as the stocks themselves. The stocks
are held, first, for the use of Barbara Ann Murray, daring
her natural life, and after h«er death for the use of all her chil-
dren and descendants, which she may then leave living, to take
per stirpes and not per capita, and in case there be no children,
or their descendants living at the time of her death, then in
trust, that the property shall be conveyed and assigned to the
right heirs of the devisor. But the trusts of the deed, are,
first, for the use of the said Barbara Ann Murray, Airing her
coverture and widowhood, if she survive? her husband, and
upon her death, in trust, for the use and benefit, in equal por-
tions of all her children, by her said husband, Richard C. Mur-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 423   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives