clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 380   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

380 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
and respondent, the said Boyle should become tenant to res-
pondent of said premises, in place of said Osborne, and an
agreement, in writing, to that effect, was signed by said Boyle,
since which time the said Osborne has ceased to have any in-
terest whatever, in, or control over, or possession of, said pre-
mises; and at or about the same time, said Osborne assigned
to him the policy of insurance on said property, which assign-
ment was presented to the insurance office, but being rejected,
this respondent, on the 3d day of April, 1845, and before the
death of said Osborne, effected an insurance in his own name on
said premises. That in further exercise of ownership over
said property, respondent, as early as the 29th of August, 1844,
discharged the mortgage of parcel of said premises, to John S.
Darnell and others, mentioned in said conveyances, and obtain-
ed a release therefor. That, subsequently, Levi Benjamin, ano-
ther mortgagee mentioned in said deeds, having obtained a de-
cree for the sale of the premises mortgaged to him, a certain
David Stewart, as trustee for Sarah Goldsmith, the wife of the
respondent, purchased up said mortgage, and had the decree
entered for his use as trustee as aforesaid; that this purchase
was made to prevent a sale of, and for the protection of respon-
dent's interest in said mortgaged premises.
He further states, that he is unable to state the particular
times at which he made the loan to said Osborne, for security
whereof, her promissory note for $21,500 was given him. That
at the time of his intermarriage with his present wife, Sarah
Goldsmith, in or about the year 1832, said Osborne was indebted
unto his said wife in a considerable sum of money. From that
time to the 5th of November, 1842, numerous loans were made
by defendant to said Osborne, and the said note represents the
result of all the dealings between her and defendant, including
the sum due his wife as aforesaid, up to said dates. Defendant
avers that he has no books, or book of accounts. In making
his loans to said Osborne, he sometimes took her note, at other
times, he would make a loose memorandum thereof, and again
he would suffer the loan to rest in the recollection of the par-
ties. From time to time, settlements were had between the

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 380   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives