clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 368   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

368 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
ALFRED C. NOWLAND
vs. DECEMBER TERM, 1848.
JOHN GLENN ET AL.
[CHANCERY PRACTICE.]
A DECREE is not considered as enrolled until the close of the term at which it
was passed, which does not expire until the commencement of the ensuing
term, and, therefore, a decree passed during the sittings of a term, may be
opened, vacated, or reformed, upon a bill filed before the close of the term,
though not until after the close of the sittings of that term.
[The facts of the case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion.
The case of Crawford vs. Severson, referred to, will be found
reported in 5 Gill, 443.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
The proceedings in this case show, that pending the suit in-
stituted in this court, by William Crawford, Jr. against John
Severson and Samuel Severson, so much of the legacy therein
mentioned, as was charged upon the land devised by Thomas
Severson to Samuel Severson, was paid by the said Samuel,
and the complainant, to whom the said land had been conveyed
by Samuel, in the year 1834. The final payment was made
by the complainant in this case on the 30th of December, 1836,
when a final release and discharge to him was executed by
Crawford, the complainant, in the case first mentioned.
Notwithstanding this release, however, it appears a decree
passed in this court on the 20th of March, 1848, for the sale of
the land devised to the said Samuel, as well as that devised to
John Severson for the payment of the legacies, respectively
charged upon them, although Samuel Severson had died long
prior thereto.
The bill in this case prays, that the decree of March, 1848,
in so far as the same authorizes and directs the sale of the
land devised by Thomas Severson to Samuel Severson, and
conveyed by the latter to the plaintiff, in this case may be re-
scinded and revoked; and I do not understand from the an-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 368   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives