clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 352   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

962 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
ties and responsibilities it imposes, merely because there may
be some want of congeniality in their tempers and dispositions.
Public policy and morality alike condemn these partial disso-
lutions of the matrimonial union. It is, says an eminent judge,
throwing the parties back upon society, "in the-undefined and
dangerous characters of a- wife without a husband, and a hus-
band without a wife," and to justify the court in doing so,
reasons of a grave and' weighty nature should exist. I do not
think the present case is marked by those features, which,
looking to the policy by which courts are governed upon a
subject; of so much delicacy, should induce me to decree a sep-
aration. Our statute, unlike that of New York, would compel
me, if I interfere at all, to separate these parties permanently,
and not for a limited time. There, the decree may be for a lim-
ited period, or forever, as under the circumstances-may seem
just and reasonable. With us, as the decree must place a per-
petual barrier between the husband and wife, the causes which
should lead to it ought to be more urgent and imperative, than
if by a temporary separation, opportunity would be given for
reconciliation, a consideration, says Chancellor Kent, of more
weight if the unhappy parties have a common offspring, to
effected by their infirmities." And in this case, It appears,
such offspring does exist, Whose life may be embittered by the
unhappy dissensions of the parents.
It is, thereupon, and Tor these reasons, this 29th day of April,
1861, by John Johnson, 'Chancellor, and by the authority of
this court, adjudged, ordered and decreed, that the bill of com-
plaint, filed in this case,'lie and the same is hereby dismissed,
but without costs.
WM. J. WARD, for Petitioner.
JOHN H. ING, for Defendant.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 352   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives