clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 345   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

COLES VS. COLES. 345
wife's part of conducting her present suitor divorce, alimony
and other relief, and hereby gives-his consent to her using said
;money for any purpose she sees fit. He insists that the fact
that the expenses of her sickness, and the care and nurture-of
her infant are heavy, and that she is unable to defray the same,
does not furnish her with a right to the interference of the
court, because, without cause of grievance or quarrel of any
kind on the part of his wife, she deserted her husband and left
the home, which he had provided, for her, and which is still
open to her, and has refused to live with and under the protec-
tion of her husband, and at his house, where every comfort and
luxury would have been found and provided for her. He states,
that since August last he has been pressing and anxious that
the suit should be brought to a termination; that it might have
been tried long ere this but for the interposition of the com-
plainant. That time and again respondent has invoked the aid
of the court, as the record will show, to have the commission
returned, in order to set the cause down for hearing; that he
is ready to try it at any time, and now offers to submit it with- ,
out argument on the day fixed for taking up the petition for
alimony, &c. That the anguish of mind into which respondent
has been thrown by the cruel conduct of his wife and her fami-
ly has prevented his making any exertions in his business, and
instead of making near $1200 J»er annum, he has lost more
than that sum during the year 1850, and that he now requires,
at the hands of his creditors to whom he is indebted, an in-
dulgence or extension of time for the amounts due to them. In
view of these facts, be submits .whether, under the circum-
stances, alimony, pendente life, ought to be granted. Upon the
hearing of this petition the following opinion was delivered :]
THE CHANCELLOR:
This case comes before the court upon the petition of the
complainant filed on the 4th of January last, praying for ali-
mony, pendente lite, and for means to defray the cost and ex-
penses of the suit. The,cause originated in a bill filed by the
petitioner on the equity side of Baltimore County Court, on the

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 345   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives