clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 290   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

390 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
a full statement of all the facts and proceedings therein, has
already been reported. (Ante, page 178.) Previous to that
decision, to wit, on the 27th of March, 1851, upon a petition
filed by the defendant, praying leave to take new testimony
discovered since the return of the commissions, and since the
cause had been set down for hearing, the Chancellor passed the
following order: "Ordered, that a commission issue to Samuel
W. Jones and William S. Waters, of Somerset county, to take
further proof in this case, as prayed, and that such further
proof be read at the hearing thereof, provided, that the bearing
of said cause shall not be delayed by reason of this order, un-
less the complainant should ask for the delay. The additional
proof, to be taken under this order, to be taken on three days
notice to the opposite party, or his or her solicitor." No delay
having been asked for by the complainants, the cause was sub-
mitted and argued, and the opinion already referred to, deliver-
ed on the 29th of April, 1861.
After this, to wit, on the 28th of May, 1851, the complain-
ant filed a petition for a rehearing of the cause, upon the point
of the title to negro Isaac, in which it is stated, that since
the argument of the cause, viz. being the week succeeding the
28th of April, 1851, the complainant had discovered new and
material testimony in reference to the said negro Isaac. That
Joshua Reece, a competent witness, would prove the following
facts, to wit, that Isaac was for some two years, or thereabouts,
in the possession of Jesse Hughes, and claimed by him until,
by his services, he had worked out about thirty or forty dollars,
a balance of money which said Jesse had paid for said Josiah
Hughes, as the said witness had understood from Jesse; that
Isaac was restored by said Jesse to Josiah, some time before
said Josiah's death, the said Jesse, admitting himself to be
repaid, and said negro to belong to said Josiah; that Isaac
then remained in the possession of said Josiah, from that time
until his death, and that the witness lived in the family of Jesse
Hughes, before the year 1815, and until the death of said
Josiah.
The petition then states, that the witness removed from

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 290   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives