clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 599   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INDEX. 599

VENDOR'S LIEN—CotKniw;.

lien, it will not pass to the assignee simply upon the footing of the as-
signment of the debt. Dvcon vs. Dixon, 220.

3. There are cases in which the benefit of the vendor's lien has been ex-
tended to third persons, but they are cases in which the marshaling of
assets has led to such results, or where sureties, who have been com-
pelled to pay for their principals, have been, by substitution, clothed
with all the rights and. remedies of those whose debts they paid. Ib.

4. There has been no case found, where the assignee of a note or other
security given for the purchase money of land, has been permitted to
sustain a claim of this description on an implied agreement to assign
the lien, though cases may be found in which, by express agreement, the
lien has passed to the assignee of the bond or note. Ib.

5. The lien being intended to secure the payment of the purchase money
to the vendor, an assignment of the notes or bonds given therefor,
without responsibility, and for value, is equivalent to payment, and
extinguishes the lien. Ib.
See PRACTICE IM CHANCERY, 35.
VESTED ESTATE.

See WILL AMP TESTAMENT, 15.

VOLUNTARY CONVEYANCE AND AGREEMENT.
See CONVEYANCE, VACATING OF, 2 to 6.

DEEDS VOID UNDER THE INSOLVENT LAWS.
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, 13,
VOIR DIRE.

See PRACTICE in CHANCERY, 26.
WAIVER.

See COMMISSIONS, 2.

PRACTICE IN CHANCERY, 28.
WARRANT OF RESURVEY.

See PATENTS.
WARRANTY.

1. Though the seller of a chattel, of which he has possession, warrants the
title, he is not bound to answer for the quality, unless he expressly
warrants the goods to be sound and good, or unless he makes a fraud-
ulent misrepresentation, or uses some fraudulent concealment con-
cerning them, which amounts to a warranty in law. Taynwn vs.
Mitchell, 496.

2. An assertion respecting an article must be positive and unequivocal,
and one on which the buyer places reliance, in order to amount to a
warranty, and if the vendee has an opportunity of examining the
article, the vendor is not liable for any latent defect, without fraud or
an express warranty, or such a direct representation as is tantamount
to it. Ib.

3. Every mere false assertion of value, when no warranty is intended, will
not constitute a ground of relief to the purchaser. If the assertion is
a mere matter of opinion, in which parties may differ, or if the seller
indulge in the common language of puffing, it will not amount to a
warranty. Ib.



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 599   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives