clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 593   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INDEX. 593.

SEAMAN'S WAGES.

I. The crew of a steamboat plying between the ports of adjoining states
upon navigable tide water, have a right to proceed for wages due them,
by libel in the District Court of the United States, and have a lien on
the vessel, her tackle and furniture, for such wages. Abbott vs. Steam
' Packet Co., 542.

3. This right to libel the vessel in the admiralty courts for wages, extends
to every officer and seaman who assists in navigating her except the
captain. 16.

3. The officers and seamen have a triple security for their wages: they
may have recourse to the vessel, the owner, and the master. Ib.

4. The seaman's claim for wages follows the ship and its proceeds, in
whose hands soever they may come, is preferred to all other demands,
and constitutes a sacred lien, which continues as long as a single plank
of the ship remains, and extends to the whole amount of compensation
due the seamen. Ib.
SECRET TRUSTS.

The court does not favor secret trusts, and will not allow them to be set

up to defeat the right of creditors. Brooks vs. Dent, 523.
SHERIFF.

See POUNDAGE FEES, 3.

PRACTICE TO CHANCERY, 43 to 45.
SLAVES,

jSee FREE NEGROES.
MANUMISSION, 1, 2.
WILL AND TESTAMEMT, 14.
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.

1. A bill for the specific performance of a contract is an application to the
sound discretion of the court, which withholds or grants relief accord-
ing to the circumstances of each particular case, and in the exercise
of its extraordinary jurisdiction in such cases, the court, though not
exempt from the general rules of equity, acts with more freedom than
when exercising its ordinary powers, rysod vs. Watts, 13.

2. The contract must be fair, and just, and certain, and founded on an
adequate consideration, and if deficient in either of these requisites, its
performance will not be decreed; hence the plaintiff who seeks the
enforcement must make out a stronger case than is required of him who
resists the decree. Ib.

3. The contract must also possess the essential ingredient of mutuality,
and in cases of inequality of obligation, it is better to leave the plaintiff
to his remedy at law for damages; for if equity acts at all, it must act
ex vigore, and carry the contract into execution with unmitigated sever-
ity. Ib.

4. The manifest object of the defendant in this case, (and which he believ-
ed was secured by the contract) was to have the minerals on his farm.
worked as well aa explored, and by the contract he gave full power to
P., the assignor of the plaintiff, to make explorations and to work the

50*



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 593   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives