clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 506   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

506 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.

scinded, either by the act of the party or the decree of the
,» court, the property had been delivered and the consideration
paid. Otherwise the court in a great majority of cases, would
be powerless to afford relief when the object of the fraud had
been accomplished.

It has been supposed, that this being a sale of personal es-
tate, the remedy should have been sought in a court of law.
But the cases which have been cited, show that, at least, this
court has concurrent jurisdiction in all cases of fraud and
damage, And in the case of Durell vs. Haley, 1 Paige, 492,
the Court of Chancery did order the restoration of goods to
the complainant upon the ground of fraud.

• In the case now under consideration, the remedy at law upon
a recision of the contract, and an action to recover back the
purchase money, would not be free from difficulty and embar-
rassment. The appropriate action, when the contract is re-
scinded by the purchaser, by returning or offering to return the
article purchased in a reasonable time, is for money had and
received, but, as in the present case, the negroes were not paid
for in money, and as it does not now appear whether the
money has been received on the securities assigned, it may, at
least, be doubted whether a count for money had and received,
could be maintained.

But I am of opinion that this court has jurisdiction; and,
Upon the grounds already stated, shall pass a decree cancelling
the contract of sale, directing a restoration of the slaves to the
vendors, and a return to the complainant of the consideration
paid for them, and for costs against the defendants.

Something was said about a provision in the decree for an
account of the hires and profits of the negroes, and other mat-
ters connected with, and affecting the equities of the parties.
But the pleadings do not make a case which will authorize
such a decree.

All that I can do upon this bill, is to rescind the contract in
toto, and put the parties, as far as practicable, in statu quo.

[An appeal has been taken from this decree, and is still de-
pending.]



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 506   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives