clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 500   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

500 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.

The Court of Appeals of this state in the case of Joyce and
Wife vs. Taylor, 6 G. & J,, 64, said "that if a party under-
takes to make a statement of facts as true, Without a know-
ledge of their truth or falsehood, and they operate to the decep-
tion of the other party, and thereby induce him to do what he
would not otherwise do, it will be avoided. The gist of the
inquiry being, not whether the party making the statement
knew it to be false, but whether the statement made as true,
was believed to be true; and, therefore, if false, deceived the
other party to whom it was made."

These principles relieve the court in this case from the
necessity, always an unpleasant one, of deciding whether the
representations made to the complainant in regard to the ap-
praisement of these slaves, and their condition of bodily health,
were wilful and false assertions, or not. That such represen-
tations were made, and that they were untrue in point of fact,
is to my mind too clearly proved to be disputed successfully.
And I am quite satisfied that reliance was placed by the pur-
chaser upon these representations, and that they influenced his
judgment in making the purchase.

Whether known to the vendor to be untrue, or not, the mis-
representation was of something material, constituting an in-
ducement to the purchaser, and in which he placed confidence,
and was misled to his injury. These afford, according to the
authorities, good ground of relief. 1 Story's Equity, sections
193, 194, 195, 197.

It has been urged, however, in this case, that, especially
with reference to the appraisement of the negroes, the means
of information were equally accessible to both parties, and that
it was the folly of the purchaser not to look at the record and
inform himself.

But the rule, as laid down by Chancellor Kent, vol. 2, sec.
39, page 484, and to which the commendation of Mr. Justice
Story gives additional weight, appeal's to be, that though the
means of correct information be equally open to both parties,
yet, if either of them does or says anything, tending to impose
''upon the other, and he is imposed upon to his injury, the con-
tract will not be allowed to stand.



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 500   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives