clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 406   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

406 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.

W. Hilleary, one of the commissioners, who testifies that
Crouch said that the valuation was lower than he anticipated,
it would seem impossible that this ground of complaint can be
maintained.

The only objection urged in the petition is, that Walter
Smith had removed from the land, after the sale, certain parcels
of wood and rail stuff, which he had previously cut down in the
exercise of the right given him by the will. This, it is said,
was not known to the persons selected to make the valuation,
and if known would have had an influence upon their judg-
ment, and reduce the amount allowed by them to Mr. Smith.

It is very certain that as this wood and timber had been cut
down prior to the sale, it did not pass to the purchasers of the
land; it was severed from the inheritance and became, and was,
personal property, and having been cut by Smith in the fair
exercise of the right given him by the will, was his property ;

and no reservation was required to authorize him to remove it.

The commissioners made their valuation on the 25th of Sep-
tember, 1848, after the wood and rails had been removed, and
it is to be presumed, their estimate was a prospective one, hav-
ing reference exclusively to the future. Two of the commis-
sioners say, that the right claimed, and exercised by Smith, to
remove the wood and rails, if known to them would have had
no influence upon their judgment; and I can see nothing in the
statement of the other which would induce me, under all the
circumstances of this case, to reject the return.

If Mr. Tomlin is to be believed, and there is not certainly
the slightest ground to impugn his credit, which is entitled to
the more weight, because he is swearing against his interest,
Crouch knew, and consented that Smith should take the wood
and rails away, and it is clearly shown by the evidence of Mr.
Hilleary, that the valuation was less than Crouch expected.

The petition must, therefore, be dismissed, and the return of
the commissioners ratified.

[No appeal was taken from this order.]



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 406   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives