clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 402   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

402 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.

and gave them the privilege of cutting from his lands in Anne
Arundel county, devised to his four unmarried daughters, "so
much wood and timber as might be necessary for the support
of the lands" devised to his said widow and son.

The lands out of which this privilege was granted were after-
wards sold under a decree of this court, with the understanding
that the widow and son of the testator, should receive out of
the proceeds of sale, so much in lieu of said privilege as the
Chancellor might deem right; and certain persons having
been appointed to value the same, they reported, that the widow
was entitled to receive $150 and the son $500.

At this stage of the proceedings a petition was filed by
.Crouch and Lazenby, who had intermarried with two of the
parties entitled to a share of the proceeds of the land sold, and
who were also the purchasers thereof, objecting to the ratifica-
tion of this report, on the ground, that Walter Smith had, after
the sale of the property, removed from the premises a quantity
of wood and rail stuff which had been previously cut down by
him; and praying, in the event of the sale being ratified, that
ttie value of the wood and timber so cut, might be deducted
.from the proportions of the valuation to be paid by the petition-
ers to said Smith.

The right of Walter Smith to exercise the privilege granted
him by his father's will, had never been called in question by
the previous proceedings, nor was any notice given by this pe-
tition of an attempt to resist it; but at the hearing, the counsel
for the petitioners contended that the testator, by a codicil to his
will, had revoked the privilege, and that said Walter was not
entitled to any allowance in lieu thereof.

The matter of this petition having been argued by counsel,
the Chancellor at this term, after stating the case, delivered his
opinion, as follows:]

THE CHANCELLOR:

It appears by the evidence, that the wood and rails which
had been thus removed by Smith, amounting probably to some
sixty or eighty dollars in value, were cut by him prior to the



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 402   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives