clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 267   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

GREEN VS. PUTNEY. 267

There is another view of this subject which has a strong ten-
dency, in my judgment, to justify Green, the trustee, in paying
these fees to the counsel. He was, by the terms of the deed of
August, 1839, creating the trust, entitled to an allowance for
costs and expenses attending its execution, inclusive of a rea-
sonable commission to himself; and such allowances, should
the nature of the trust and the circumstances of the case re-
quire it, will embrace, even without an express provision, the
expense of employing an attorney. Willis on Trustees, 146,
147; 10 Law Lib., 69; Hagthrop vs. Hook, 1 Gill & Johns.,
273; 2 Mod. Ch. Prac., 168.

In this case, it is manifest, that notwithstanding the assign-
ments of the creditors to Putney and Riddle and German, that
the agency and active exertions of the trustee were indispensa-
ble to the recovery of the money from the United States, he
being considered by the government, the party alone authorized
to receive it.

Now assuming, for the sake of the argument, that Putney,
was entitled to one-fourth of this fund, (and that is certainly the
extent of his claim,) was not Green, as his trustee, authorized
to unite with Riddle and Gorman, the owners of the other three-
fourths, in the contract which they made with the council upon
the subject of fees ? Was not this agreement on the part of
the owners of three-fourths of the claims, the strongest possible
evidence of the reasonableness of the compensation.

The court is without the necessary data to found a very
satisfactory opinion upon the subject; but, seeing that parties
interested to the extent of three-fourths made this contract, and
forming the best judgment I can, from the lights before me of
the difficulties which had to be surmounted, before the claim
could be allowed, I am not disposed to visit upon the trustee
loss on account of it.

I am of opinion, therefore, that Green is entitled to be allow-
ed for this payment to the counsel, not only as against Gorman
and Riddle, but, as against Putney, also.

The next question relates to the trustee's claim, to be allowed
for the sums of $600, and $200, provided for in the paper



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 267   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives