clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 249   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HARNESS VS. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL CO. 249

eminent domain, omitted to provide compensation to the owner of the prop-
erty taken for public uses; and such provision was made by the 15th section
of the act of 1824, ch. 79, passed to confirm an act of the legislature of Vir-
ginia, incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company. The 15th
and 19th sections of the charter of this company construed,

The taking of acceptances for a pre-existing debt by a creditor, cannothave the
effect of extinguishing the debt.

If the inquisition of the jury,when returned to and affirmed by the court, under
the act of 1824, constitutes a debt at all, it is a debt of record, and of equal
grade with a judgment, and, therefore, not merged by it.

When the company refuses or neglects to pay for the land condemned for their
use, the owner has a right to call upon this court to protect, by injunction,
his property from injury, until the money is paid.

The complainants were held to be entitled to interest on their claim, from the
day of the affirmation of the inquisition of the jury by the court.

[On the 4th June, 1838, a previous inquisition having been
set aside by Alleghany County Court, a new jury met and pro-
ceeded to condemn the lands of the complainants, for the use
of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, one of the defend-
ants in this cause. By their inquisition, which was affirmed by
the court of said county, on the 8th of October following, the
sum of $13,256 was awarded to the complainants, as damages
for the lands so condemned. Shortly after the ratification of
this inquisition, the company commenced operations upon the
condemned lands, making some excavations upon the upper
and lower ends of the line, and continued working upon them
at intervals, until the years 1840 and 1841, when their opera-
tions were temporarily suspended. On the 1st April 1840, the
money not being paid, the company accepted the drafts of
William Harness, acting for himself, and under a letter of attor-
ney from the other parties, payable to his order, for the amount
of the inquisition, with interest from the day of its ratification.
These drafts matured on the 1st December, 1840, a-nd having
been dishonored, suit was brought upon them by the payee in
Alleghany County Court, and judgment was recovered, in his
name, at October term, 1842. On the 2d June, 1843, a fieri
facias was issued upon this judgment, and levied by the sheriff
upon the property condemned, and upon another piece of land,
supposed to belong to the company, but which was, in fact,



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 249   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives