clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 197   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WATERS VS. WATERS. 197

had possessed himself of certain negroes, and other personal
property of the deceased, claiming the same under a gift from
him; and, was also in possession of a tract of land in Balti-
more county, belonging to the testator's estate, which he re-
fused to deliver to the petitioner, although, by a decree of the
Chancellor, passed in January, 1848, in a cause between the
said Charles A. Waters, complainant, and Charles Howard,
and others, defendants, it was declared, that the said Charles
A. Waters, had no title to said real and personal property, and
that although an appeal was taken from the decree by said
Waters, he had failed to give bond for the prosecution thereof;

and contended, that it would be better for all parties, to permit
him to retain possession of the property, and make his share
of the estate in the hands of the trustee, responsible for the
prosecution of the appeal. The petitioner further stated, that,
at a sale made by him as trustee, the said Waters, became a
purchaser of a part of the testator's estate, but he refusing to
comply with terms of sale, the same was resold at a consider-
able loss, with which the share of said Waters, in the estate of
the deceased, was properly chargeable. The object of the
petition, was to obtain the directions of the court, as to the
manner in which the trustee should act under the circum-
stances. An answer was put in to the petition, and same
testimony taken in relation thereto; and the cause having been
heard at this term, the Chancellor delivered the following
opinion :]

THE CHANCELLOR :

Upon considering the petition, filed by Freeborn G. Waters,
in this case, on the 20th of March last, and the answer thereto,
and the other proceedings in the cause, and after hearing the
counsel, my opinion is, that the share of the income and profits
of the trust estate, in the hands of the petitioner, to which
under the will of the testator, Charles Waters, his grandson,
Charles A. Waters is entitled, are not chargeable with the
claims against the said Charles A. Waters, which are stated to
have become due to the testator in his lifetime—my opinion
17*



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 197   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives