clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 192   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

192 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.

undisturbed enjoyment of the property, of which she was then
seized aad possessed, or to which abe might be entitled in ex-
pectancy, entered into a contract with her, and the complainants
as trustees, not to intermeddle with her property in any manner,
but to permit her to appropriate it to her own use, or to such
other use oruses, as she, in the manner specified in the contract,
might appoint. The marriage was consummated between the
said Brown and Elliott, shortly after the execution of this con-
traet, and the latter having subsequently become entitled, under
the will of her uncle, to certain real and personal property, the
greater portion thereof came into the hands of trustees, who
permitted the said Brown and wife, to hold the same for several
years; at the expiration of which time, the wife died, leaving
two children, the issue of said marriage; without having made
any disposition of the trust property; and leaving unpaid, sev-
eral debts contracted by her, and for which her creditors contend-
ed, that her separate estate was responsible. After her death,
her husband continued to retain possession of the property,
contending that, as no appointment in pursuance of the power
furnished by the contract, had been wade by bis wife, the con-
tract could no longer operate to debar hito of his marital rights.
The bill was filed by the trustees, to obtain the direction of the
court, as to theirproper course in regard to the husband's claim,
and to aseertaia, whether the trust had expired, and if the cred-
itors of the deceased could consequently proceed at law to re-
cover the said debts.]

THE CHANCELLOR :

It appears to me, that the antenuptial contract in this case,
does nothing more, than suspend the marital rights of the hus-
band, during the life of the wife, with power reserved to her, to
dispose of the property by will, in writing, or by any other
writing whatever, executed in the mode prescribed by the in-
strument, and the wife having failed to make such testamentary,
or other disposition, the rights of the husband are revived by
her death.

There is nothing in this contract, which in terms, or by ne-



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 192   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives