clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Sioussat's The English Statutes in Maryland, 1903
Volume 195, Page 67   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

531] The English Statutes in Maryland. 67
Common Law, the English statutes which existed at the time
of their emigration and which they found applicable to their
local circumstances. The immunities and privileges of the
charters are emphasized also."" Or if we consider the Fairfax
Resolutions in Virginia, drawn in 1774 by George Mason, we
find that they begin with the old statement that the colonists of
Virginia were not a conquered people;" and similar citations,
showing the basis of the English law might be made from
writers from. Massachusetts to Georgia.
These were not sufficient to justify the Revolution; and
in their need the colonial writers gleaned the rich fields of
John Locke's Second Essay on Government, and of the works
of continental publicists, adapting from these sources the
doctrine of the Law of Nature and basing their claims on the
rights which that gave mankind. The only use of this system
which we wish now to discuss is the employment of it to'
explain the legal system of America, in the following manner.
In a very interesting debate, which John Adams has re-
ported for us, the committee appointed by the Continental
Congress to state the rights of the colonists discussed the
basis on which they should fix their rights." The arguments
are too long to quote: suffice it to remark that the radical
wing declared that English law did not bind or had not bound
the colonists as the law of England, but by their own choos-
ing, and only by their consent. As was indicated above, this
idea, so effectively destructive of the sovereignty of Great
Britain was not pressed in the Declaration and Resolves: but
the same principle was urged by Jefferson in his Summary
View, and by John Adams in his Kovanglus. to mention only
two of the framers of political opinion in America. The
8 Adams, C. F.: The works of John Adam?. Vol. 2. Appendix C,
where the original draft is given for comparison. The Declara-
tion and Resolves may be found conveniently in Macdonald's Select
Charters, etc., pp. 357-361.
9 Rowland: The Life of George Mason, Vol. r, Appendix VII.
It is not impossible that these were influenced by the Maryland
Resolutions of 1722, which had been readopted three years before
(See Above p. 64). Mason mav have known of these.
10 Adams, C. P.: The Works of John Adams, Vol. II. pp. 370-373.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Sioussat's The English Statutes in Maryland, 1903
Volume 195, Page 67   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives