Volume 195, Page 53 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
517] The English Statutes in Maryland. 53 France, is met by emphasizing the fact that these countries were already civilized and had laws of their own. The con- sideration of the Earl of Derby's Case, and Calvin'sCase,leads up to a long citation from Grotius on the wisdom of yielding even to a conquered country its own laws. But Maryland, argues Dulany, is not conquered, or, if so, only as against the Indians. The English settlers have lost no rights. This finishes the first task, the establishment of those rights on the ground of English citizenship. To this is now added, by way of reinforcement, a second line of argument based upon the rights conferred by the royal charter. By the terms of this grant, all rights of Englishmen are distinctly and incon- testably bestowed on the freemen of Maryland. In this way the former method of reasoning applies. The statutes of England were necessary to the safe enjoyment of these rights and continue to be their defense. After condemning the adverse opinion of " an eminent lawyer," Dulany clearly states that the charter does not really give these rights, as new ones, but merely recognizes them as existent, as was the case in Magna Charta in England. The argument that, because Maryland has her own Legislature, she cannot have English laws he considers futile; for the different circumstances of the colony necessitate changes which can only be decided by a local body. It does not follow that the Legislature of Maryland can enact for that Province all the English statutes. The concluding paragraphs are in some ways the most interesting of all; for here, deserting the argument from the English law. he proposes a Lockeian theory of society, and applies this to the settlers of Maryland. If these agreed to make the law of their mother country their own law, and on long experience are convinced of the equality and justice of them, " Will anyone say that they are obliged to change those laws, or to have them upon any other terms than they have always had them, without their own consent, or the inter- position of the supreme authority of their mother country." The familiar and long-continued reception of the English |
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 195, Page 53 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.